LIKE OUR WORK?
Mark Carney’s involvement in various financial and environmental initiatives, focusing on the concerns raised in the X post by Ann Rolle on March 16, 2025, as well as addressing the specific questions about the management relationships of Brookfield Asset Management, Island Timberlands, and investors PSP, AIMCo, and BCIMC, the status of a China Investment Corporation bid for a 12 percent share, and British Columbia’s 2019 timber exports to China. The analysis reveals a troubling pattern of Carney’s actions, exposing potential conflicts of interest, questionable financial maneuvers, and a disconnect between his public promises and the reality of his policies, particularly in relation to his Net Zero agenda and influence over Canadian pension funds.
The X post by user Ann Rolle highlights serious allegations against Mark Carney, who, as of March 2025, has taken on a prominent role as Canada’s Finance Minister while also being a contender for Liberal leadership. Rolle claims that Carney is targeting the Canada Pension Plan, valued at 699 billion dollars as of December 2024, to fund his Net Zero agenda, an initiative that has already drawn significant scrutiny. Supporting documents in the post, including a U.S. House Judiciary Committee report from December 13, 2024, titled “Sustainable Shakedown, How a Climate Cartel of Money Managers Colluded to Take Over the Board of Americas Largest Energy Company,” suggest that Carney’s involvement in climate focused financial groups like the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) has led to accusations of financial blackmail. The report details how GFANZ, cochaired by Carney, allegedly pressured companies to align with Net Zero goals, prompting major players like BlackRock and six U.S. banks, followed by four Canadian banks, to exit the initiative by early 2025 due to fears of legal repercussions, as reported by CBC News on January 20, 2025. This mass exodus underscores the instability and controversy surrounding Carney’s climate initiatives, raising questions about his credibility and the potential risks he poses to Canadian financial stability.
Carney’s rhetoric, as seen in his March 4, 2025, statement on markcarney.ca, where he promises to “spend less and invest more,” appears hollow when examined against his actions. He claims to have a “real plan, not just slogans,” yet the reality, as shown in the X post’s accompanying news clip from March 16, 2025, on News Channel, reveals a lack of transparency. The headline “New Finance Minister Wont Detail How Budget Will Be Balanced” directly contradicts Carney’s assurances, suggesting that his plan lacks substance and is more about optics than actionable policy. This discrepancy is particularly concerning given his influence over the Canada Pension Plan. The Appointment Provisions section of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act, cited in the X post, states that the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Finance, can appoint board members, and with two current vacancies, Carney could potentially install allies to redirect CPP funds toward his Net Zero goals. This possibility, combined with the U.S. investigation into his alleged predatory practices, paints a picture of a man more interested in advancing his agenda than protecting Canadians’ financial security.
Turning to the specific questions about Brookfield Asset Management, Island Timberlands, and their investors, the management relationship reveals Carney’s deep ties to controversial financial dealings. Brookfield Asset Management, where Carney served as chairman until stepping away in 2025 to replace Justin Trudeau, manages Island Timberlands, a British Columbia timber company owned by PSP Investments, AIMCo, and BCIMC, also known as BCI. According to a press release from BCI on September 18, 2024, these investors affiliated TimberWest and Island Timberlands in 2018 to share services while operating independently, a structure in place since BCI and AIMCo became limited partners in Island Timberlands in 2005, and BCI and PSP acquired TimberWest in 2011. Carney’s role at Brookfield during this period places him at the center of these operations, which have been criticized for their impact on Indigenous lands, as detailed in the academic paper “Land grabbing on the edge of empire, the longue duree of feesimple forest lands and Indigenous resistance in British Columbia.” The paper describes how such private timber holdings have historically marginalized Indigenous communities, a legacy that Carney, through his leadership at Brookfield, has indirectly perpetuated.
The question of the China Investment Corporation’s bid for a 12 percent share in Island Timberlands further exposes Carney’s questionable oversight. In 2012, CBC News and the Vancouver Sun reported that CIC was negotiating a 12.5 percent stake in Island Timberlands, valued at 100 million dollars, a deal facilitated by Brookfield under Carney’s watch. However, no public records, including press releases from Brookfield or CIC, confirm the deal’s completion, indicating it likely fell through or was deliberately kept under wraps. This lack of transparency during Carney’s tenure at Brookfield raises serious concerns about his accountability, especially given Brookfield’s significant investments in China, totaling over 3 billion dollars in statelinked real estate and energy companies, as reported by The Bureau on March 14, 2025. These investments, while Carney was chairman, suggest a pattern of prioritizing foreign interests over Canadian ones, a troubling trait for someone now overseeing Canada’s finances.
Finally, the issue of British Columbia’s 2019 timber exports to China highlights the broader implications of Carney’s involvement in the forestry sector. The Ministry of Forests records show that 84 percent of the total volume advertised for export was exported, but the specific amount to China is not publicly disclosed. Historical data from Trade and Invest BC indicates that China was a major market, with exports reaching 1 billion dollars in 2017, suggesting a significant portion likely went to China in 2019. Under Carney’s leadership at Brookfield, which managed Island Timberlands’ export activities, this high export volume contributed to economic gains for Brookfield and its investors but at the expense of local communities and Indigenous groups, who, as the academic paper notes, have long resisted the privatization of forest lands. Carney’s failure to address these social and environmental impacts while pushing a Net Zero agenda that critics, like user Dave W. Palmer in a reply to Rolle’s post, argue is a “death wish” due to the essential role of CO2 in photosynthesis, reveals a fundamental disconnect in his priorities.
In conclusion, Mark Carney’s actions, from his alleged financial blackmail in the U.S. to his opaque management at Brookfield and his current influence over the Canada Pension Plan, demonstrate a pattern of selfinterest and recklessness. His Net Zero agenda, while presented as a noble pursuit, has led to the withdrawal of major financial institutions due to legal fears, and his promises of fiscal responsibility lack detail and credibility. His involvement in Brookfield’s timber operations, including the unconfirmed China Investment Corporation bid and the high export volumes to China, further illustrates a disregard for transparency and local impact. Canadians should be deeply concerned about Carney’s leadership, as his track record suggests a prioritization of global agendas and personal gain over the wellbeing of the nation he now serves. This report, grounded in factual evidence, lays bare the reality of Carney’s tenure, urging a critical examination of his role in Canada’s future.
LIKE OUR WORK?