LIKE OUR WORK?
In November 2015, the Liberal Party of Canada, led by Justin Trudeau, swept into power with a majority government, promising transparency, ethical governance, and progressive change. Over the subsequent decade, however, their tenure has been marred by a series of corruption scandals, ethical breaches, mismanagement, and questionable leadership decisions that have eroded public trust and cast serious doubt on their suitability for reelection. From the outset, the Liberals positioned themselves as a beacon of integrity, yet their actions have consistently contradicted this narrative, revealing a pattern of self-interest, negligence, and disregard for democratic principles. As of April 17, 2025, with the transition to Mark Carney as leader following Trudeau’s resignation, the party faces renewed scrutiny, particularly as Carney’s own history suggests a continuation of the same troubling tendencies. This report provides a comprehensive, chronological recap of the Liberal Party’s corruption and governance failures from 2015 to 2025, detailing the incidents, their implications, and the compelling case for why they do not deserve to be reelected.
The Liberal government’s troubles began almost immediately after their 2015 election victory. One of the earliest scandals was the Phoenix pay system, a payroll initiative launched in 2016 to streamline federal employee payments. Intended to save costs, the system was implemented without adequate testing, leading to catastrophic failures. Hundreds of thousands of public servants faced delayed payments, overpayments, or no payments at all, with some enduring financial hardship for years. The cost to fix the debacle ballooned to over $2.2 billion, a staggering waste of taxpayer money. The government’s decision to terminate human resources staff prematurely and ignore warnings about the system’s readiness reflected a profound lack of oversight and competence, setting a troubling tone for their tenure. This mismanagement was not an isolated incident but a precursor to the Liberals’ recurring inability to handle public funds responsibly.
In 2016, another incident further tarnished the Liberals’ image. During a heated parliamentary session, Trudeau physically intervened in a crowded House of Commons, accidentally elbowing NDP MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau in the chest while attempting to escort the Conservative whip to his seat. Dubbed “ElbowGate,” the incident drew widespread criticism for Trudeau’s lack of composure and judgment. Although he issued multiple apologies, the episode underscored a troubling impulsiveness, particularly for a leader expected to model decorum. While minor compared to later scandals, ElbowGate contributed to early perceptions of Trudeau as prone to poor decision-making under pressure, a theme that would resurface repeatedly.
By 2017, the Liberals faced their first major ethics scandal, the Aga Khan vacation. Trudeau and his family accepted a Christmas vacation on the Aga Khan’s private island, traveling via private helicopter, while the Aga Khan Foundation, a registered lobbyist, received millions in federal funding. The trip was not disclosed as required, and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson ruled that Trudeau violated four provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act. This made him the first sitting prime minister found guilty of ethics breaches. The incident raised serious questions about Trudeau’s judgment and impartiality, as accepting lavish gifts from a lobbyist suggested a willingness to prioritize personal benefits over public duty. The scandal set a precedent for the Liberals’ recurring ethical lapses, undermining their promise of transparent governance.
In 2018, the Liberals’ international reputation took a hit during Trudeau’s official trip to India. The visit was widely mocked for the Trudeau family’s elaborate traditional costumes, which critics deemed culturally insensitive and out of touch. More alarmingly, Jaspal Atwal, a convicted attempted murderer, was invited to a reception hosted by the Canadian High Commission. The invitation, later rescinded, exposed significant vetting failures and raised questions about the government’s competence in managing diplomatic affairs. The India trip, intended to strengthen Canada-India relations, instead became a public relations disaster, highlighting the Liberals’ propensity for avoidable missteps.
The year 2018 also saw the resurfacing of allegations that Trudeau had inappropriately touched a female reporter at a 2000 music festival in Creston, British Columbia. The woman, then a journalist, alleged groping, and Trudeau issued an apology at the time, stating he did not recall any negative interactions. When the story reemerged during the #MeToo movement, Trudeau acknowledged the incident, emphasizing his respect for women but offering no further details. The woman chose not to pursue the matter, but the allegations added to growing concerns about Trudeau’s conduct and credibility, particularly as a self-proclaimed advocate for gender equality. This incident, while not leading to legal consequences, contributed to a narrative of hypocrisy within the Liberal leadership.
In 2019, the SNC-Lavalin affair erupted, becoming one of the most damaging scandals of the Liberal tenure. SNC-Lavalin, a Quebec-based engineering firm, faced fraud and corruption charges related to bribery in Libya. Trudeau and his office pressured then-Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould to secure a deferred prosecution agreement, which would allow the company to avoid a criminal trial. Wilson-Raybould’s refusal led to her demotion and eventual resignation, sparking a national controversy. Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion’s report concluded that Trudeau’s actions constituted “flagrant attempts” to influence the judicial process, violating the Conflict of Interest Act. The scandal exposed the Liberals’ willingness to interfere in legal proceedings for political gain, particularly to protect a Quebec-based company with ties to the party. The affair also revealed internal dysfunction, as Wilson-Raybould’s testimony highlighted a culture of intimidation within the Prime Minister’s Office. The RCMP examined the matter, though no charges were laid, leaving a lasting stain on the Liberals’ integrity.
Compounding the SNC-Lavalin fallout, 2019 brought revelations about illegal donations from the company to the Liberal Party. Between 2004 and 2009, SNC-Lavalin funneled over $110,000 in illicit contributions, which were not disclosed until 2016 and only publicized in 2019. One executive faced charges, and the company signed a compliance agreement, but the delayed transparency fueled perceptions of systemic corruption within the Liberal fundraising apparatus. The timing of the revelation, during the SNC-Lavalin affair, amplified public distrust, suggesting the Liberals had long benefited from unethical financial practices.
The 2019 election campaign was further marred by the emergence of photos showing Trudeau in blackface on multiple occasions, including at a 2001 Arabian Nights gala and earlier school events. Trudeau apologized, acknowledging the racist nature of his actions and attributing them to a lack of awareness at the time. The scandal damaged Canada’s international reputation as a champion of diversity and alienated voters who viewed Trudeau’s apologies as insufficient. Coming amidst the SNC-Lavalin affair, the blackface controversy painted a picture of a leader whose personal and professional conduct consistently fell short of his public persona, further eroding the Liberals’ moral authority.
Also in 2019, Trudeau’s interaction with an Indigenous protester at a Liberal fundraiser drew criticism for insensitivity. When the woman raised concerns about poor living conditions on reserves, Trudeau sarcastically thanked her for her “donation,” a remark widely condemned as dismissive and disrespectful. The incident highlighted the Liberals’ strained relationship with Indigenous communities, despite their promises of reconciliation, and underscored Trudeau’s tendency to respond poorly to criticism.
In 2020, the WE Charity scandal further exposed the Liberals’ ethical shortcomings. The government awarded WE Charity a $912 million sole-source contract to administer the Canada Student Service Grant, a program to support students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigations revealed that Trudeau’s mother, Margaret, received $250,000 for 28 speaking engagements, and his brother, Alexandre, earned $32,000 for eight events. Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s daughter was employed by the charity, and Morneau failed to recuse himself from the decision, later repaying $41,000 in travel expenses. The Ethics Commissioner cleared Trudeau of legal wrongdoing but found the arrangement created a perception of preferential treatment. The backlash forced the government to take over the program, and Morneau resigned, highlighting the Liberals’ failure to manage conflicts of interest. The scandal reinforced the perception that the Liberals prioritized personal connections over public interest, especially during a national crisis.
Also in 2020, Trudeau’s meetings with Wei Wei, a businessman later charged in connection with an illegal casino, raised concerns about foreign influence. Wei’s delegation member donated $1 million to the Trudeau Foundation, sponsoring a statue of Pierre Trudeau, prompting questions about the Liberals’ vulnerability to questionable associations. This incident, combined with later reports of Chinese government interference, underscored the government’s lax approach to national security.
In 2020, International Trade Minister Mary Ng faced scrutiny for awarding $16,950 in sole-source contracts to Amanda Alvaro, a friend and former Liberal staffer, for media training during the pandemic. The Ethics Commissioner reprimanded Ng for breaching conflict of interest rules, citing her failure to recuse herself. While the amount was relatively small, the incident added to the growing list of Liberal ethics violations, suggesting a culture of cronyism within the cabinet.
By 2022, the ArriveCAN app scandal emerged as another example of Liberal mismanagement. Developed to screen travelers during the COVID-19 pandemic, the app’s cost escalated from an initial $80,000 to nearly $54 million, involving 23 subcontractors. A glitch in July 2022 affected 10,000 travelers, and duplicates of the app were created in days for $250,000, raising questions about oversight. The Auditor General’s audit, ordered in November 2022, confirmed excessive costs and poor contracting practices, further eroding public confidence in the Liberals’ ability to manage public funds efficiently.
In 2023, allegations of Chinese government interference in the 2019 and 2021 elections surfaced, confirmed by Canadian Security Intelligence Service reports. China allegedly funded a network of primarily Liberal candidates, raising serious concerns about democratic integrity. The Liberals’ slow response to these allegations, coupled with their failure to implement robust safeguards, suggested a troubling indifference to national security threats. The interference scandal, still under investigation as of 2025, has fueled calls for greater accountability and transparency in electoral processes.
Also in 2023, the resignation of interim Ethics Commissioner Martine Richard highlighted systemic issues within the Liberal government. Richard, the sister-in-law of Minister Dominic LeBlanc, stepped down on April 19, 2023, due to concerns about her familial ties creating a conflict of interest. The incident underscored the Liberals’ failure to maintain impartiality in key oversight roles, further damaging their credibility on ethical governance.
The Green Slush Fund scandal in 2024 added to the Liberals’ record of mismanagement. Sustainable Development Technology Canada, a $1 billion fund overseen by Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne, was found to have made 90 decisions violating conflict-of-interest policies, with $59 million awarded to ineligible projects. The Auditor General’s report prompted the fund’s shutdown in June 2024, and the RCMP launched an investigation. Champagne’s failure to ensure proper oversight reflected the Liberals’ recurring inability to manage public programs effectively, wasting taxpayer money and undermining green initiatives.
In January 2025, Trudeau’s abrupt resignation marked a pivotal moment in the Liberal Party’s decline. Citing a political crisis, Trudeau prorogued Parliament until at least March 24, 2025, a move critics decried as an attempt to evade accountability amid mounting scandals and public discontent. His departure followed years of economic challenges, rising crime, and declining approval ratings, exacerbated by the cumulative weight of the scandals detailed above. The prorogation, seen as a tactic to delay scrutiny, reinforced perceptions of a government more concerned with self-preservation than addressing national issues.
The leadership transition to Mark Carney, finalized on March 14, 2025, has done little to restore confidence. Carney, a former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor, won the Liberal leadership with over 85% of votes and immediately called a snap election on March 23, 2025. However, his entry has been overshadowed by allegations of corruption and dishonesty that rival the scandals of his predecessors. Carney’s tenure at Brookfield Asset Management, where he served as chairman, has been scrutinized for questionable financial dealings, including investments in fossil fuels and tax-advantaged jurisdictions, contradicting his public stance as a climate advocate. Critics have labeled him a “lie factory,” pointing to discrepancies between his environmental rhetoric and his firm’s actions, such as profiting from carbon-intensive projects while promoting green initiatives. Additionally, Carney’s role in advising the Trudeau government on economic policy, including the carbon tax, has been criticized as self-serving, given his financial interests in firms benefiting from such policies. His close ties to global elites and multinational corporations have fueled accusations of prioritizing corporate interests over Canadian taxpayers, further aligning him with the Liberals’ pattern of cronyism.
Carney’s leadership has also been marked by early missteps. His decision to call a snap election, barely a month after assuming office, has been criticized as opportunistic, aimed at capitalizing on his initial popularity rather than addressing the Liberals’ tarnished record. Public statements promising economic renewal and ethical reform have been met with skepticism, given his history and the party’s decade-long track record of broken promises. For instance, Carney’s claim of delivering “inclusive prosperity” contrasts with reports of his involvement in financial structures that favored wealthy investors, raising doubts about his commitment to ordinary Canadians. These concerns, combined with the Liberals’ accumulated scandals, suggest that Carney’s leadership is not a fresh start but a continuation of the same corrupt tendencies.
The Liberal Party’s decade in power has been defined by a relentless series of scandals that reveal a government more focused on personal gain, political expediency, and elite interests than on serving the public. The Phoenix pay system’s failure wasted billions and harmed public servants, while the ArriveCAN app’s cost overruns exemplified reckless spending during a crisis. Ethical breaches, from the Aga Khan vacation to the WE Charity scandal, exposed a culture of entitlement and favoritism, with Trudeau and his cabinet repeatedly prioritizing personal connections over public duty. The SNC-Lavalin affair and illegal donations underscored a willingness to bend legal and democratic principles for political advantage, while foreign interference allegations raised alarms about national security. Trudeau’s personal missteps, including blackface photos and insensitive remarks, compounded the damage, portraying a leader out of touch with Canadian values. The Green Slush Fund’s collapse and ongoing RCMP investigations further highlight the Liberals’ inability to manage critical programs, wasting public trust and resources.
The transition to Mark Carney, far from redeeming the party, has introduced a leader whose own record suggests a continuation of these failings. His financial dealings, marked by conflicts of interest and questionable ethics, align with the Liberals’ history of prioritizing elite interests. Carney’s rhetoric, promising reform while glossing over his past, mirrors the empty promises that have characterized the Liberal tenure since 2015. The snap election call, a calculated move to sidestep scrutiny, reflects the same lack of accountability that defined Trudeau’s resignation and prorogation. Canadians have endured a decade of Liberal governance that has consistently fallen short of its lofty ideals, delivering instead corruption, incompetence, and division.
The case against reelecting the Liberal Party is rooted in this exhaustive record of failure. Their ethical lapses have undermined democratic institutions, from judicial independence to electoral integrity. Their mismanagement has squandered billions, exacerbating economic challenges for ordinary Canadians. Their vulnerability to foreign influence has compromised national security, while their leadership, from Trudeau’s impulsiveness to Carney’s duplicity, has eroded public confidence. The Liberals have had a decade to prove their worth, yet their legacy is one of broken trust and unfulfilled promises. Reelection would reward a party that has repeatedly placed its own interests above those of the nation, perpetuating a cycle of corruption and neglect. Canadians deserve leadership that upholds integrity, competence, and accountability—qualities the Liberal Party has demonstrably failed to deliver. As the country faces a critical election in 2025, the Liberal record stands as a powerful argument for change, urging voters to reject a party that has lost its moral and practical mandate to govern.
LIKE OUR WORK?