Facebook has blocked Australian users from sharing or viewing news content on the platform, causing much alarm over public access to key information.
It comes in response to a proposed law which would make tech giants pay for news content on their platforms.
Australians on Thursday woke up to find that Facebook pages of all local and global news sites were unavailable.
Several government health and emergency pages were also blocked – something Facebook later asserted was a mistake.
Those outside of the country are also unable to read or access any Australian news publications on the platform.
The Australian government has strongly criticised the move, saying it demonstrated the “immense market power of these digital social giants”.
Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said the ban on news information had a “huge community impact”. About 17 million Australians visit the social media site every month.
He said the government was committed to passing the law, and “we would like to see them [Facebook] in Australia.
“But I think their actions today were unnecessary and wrong,” he added.
Google and Facebook have fought the law because they say it doesn’t reflect how the internet works, and unfairly “penalises” their platforms.
However, in contrast to Facebook, Google has in recent days signed payment deals with three major Australian media outlets.
Facebook’s action came just hours after Google agreed to pay Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp for content from news sites across its media empire.
Why is Facebook doing this?
Australian authorities had drawn up the laws to “level the playing field” between the tech giants and struggling publishers over profits. Of every A$100 (£56; $77) spent on digital advertising in Australian media these days, A$81 goes to Google and Facebook.
But Facebook said the law left it “facing a stark choice: attempt to comply with a law that ignores the realities of this relationship, or stop allowing news content on our services in Australia”.
“With a heavy heart, we are choosing the latter,” it said in a blog post.
The law sought “to penalise Facebook for content it didn’t take or ask for”, the company’s local managing director William Easton said.
Facebook said it helped Australian publishers earn about A$407m (£228m;$316m) last year through referrals, but for itself “the platform gain from news is minimal”.
Under the ban, Australian publishers are also restricted from sharing or posting any links on their Facebook pages. The national broadcaster, the ABC, and newspapers like The Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian have millions of followers.
What happened with the government sites?
Facebook’s change also denied Australians access to many key government agencies, including police and emergency services, health departments and the Bureau of Meteorology.
Other pages for charities, politicians, sports groups and other non-news organisations were also affected.
Facebook later released a statement which said these pages had been “inadvertently impacted” and would be reinstated, though it did not give a deadline.
A spokesperson said the company had “taken a broad definition” of the term “news content” in the law.
How have Australians responded?
The ban sparked an immediate backlash, with many Australians angry about their sudden loss of access to trusted and authoritative sources.
Several pointed out that Facebook was one crucial way that people received emergency updates about the pandemic and national disaster situations.
Others raised concerns about misinformation now freely circulating on the site.
“It feels obviously very restrictive in what Facebook is going to allow people to do in the future, not only in Australia but around the world,” Sydney man Peter Firth told the BBC.
Amelia Marshall said she could not believe the firm’s decision “in the middle of a pandemic”, adding: “I’ve made the long-overdue decision to permanently delete my Facebook account.”
Human Rights Watch’ Australia director said Facebook was censoring the flow of information in the country – calling it a “dangerous turn of events”.
“Cutting off access to vital information to an entire country in the dead of the night is unconscionable,” said Elaine Pearson.
How is the government responding?
Australia’s conservative government is standing by the law – which passed the lower house of parliament on Wednesday. It has broad cross-party support and will be debated again in parliament on Thursday.
“We will legislate this code. We want the digital giants paying traditional news media businesses for generating original journalistic content,” said Treasurer Josh Frydenberg who added that “the eyes of the world are watching what’s happening here”.
He said he’d also had a discussion with Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg which had been “constructive”.
But he pointed out that Facebook, like Google, had been negotiating pay deals with local organisations. This banning action had “come at an eleventh hour” and damaged the site’s reputation he said.
“What they’re effectively saying to Australians is: “You will not find content on our platform which comes from an organisation which employs professional journalists, which has editorial policies, which has fact-checking processes”.
I am sure this paragraph has touched all the internet visitors,
its really really pleasant article on building up
You actually make it appear so easy with your presentation but I in finding this topic
to be really one thing which I think I would never understand.
It kind of feels too complex and extremely extensive for me.
I am looking ahead for your next publish, I will try to
get the cling of it!
Thanks for sharing such a pleasant thought, piece of writing is pleasant,
thats why i have read it fully
I’m amazed, I must say. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s equally
educative and engaging, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head.
The issue is an issue that not enough folks are speaking
intelligently about. I am very happy I stumbled across this during my hunt for something regarding this.
Hi friends, how is everything, and what you desire
to say regarding this piece of writing, in my view its genuinely awesome in support of me.
I think what you published was actually very reasonable.
But, think about this, what if you wrote a catchier title?
I am not suggesting your information isn’t good., but what
if you added a title that grabbed folk’s attention? I mean WATCH:
Facebook blocks Australian users from viewing or sharing news – The Daily News is kinda vanilla.
You could glance at Yahoo’s home page and see how they create post headlines
to grab people to open the links. You might try adding a
video or a pic or two to get people excited about everything’ve got
to say. Just my opinion, it could bring your blog a little bit more interesting.
Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just too fantastic.
I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really
like what you are saying and the way in which you say it.
You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to
keep it smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you.
This is actually a terrific website.
Hello very nice site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb ..
I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also?
I’m glad to seek out numerous helpful info here in the post, we want work
out more techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.
. . . . .
Unquestionably consider that that you stated. Your favorite
reason appeared to be at the net the easiest factor to be aware of.
I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while other folks consider issues
that they plainly don’t know about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest
and also defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , other folks can take a signal.
Will probably be again to get more. Thank you